Women in Distress in Literature free essay sample

An analysis of two women in distress in Sylvia Plaths The Bell Jar and Elizabeth Smarts By Grand Central Station I Sat Down and Wept. This paper analyzes Esther Greenwoods By Grand Central Station I Sat Down and Wept and Sylvia Plaths The Bell Jar. In particular, the paper examines the two women in the stories and their problems in society. One may wonder, the paper proposes, to what extent people are responsible for their own happiness in life. In the case of Esther Greenwood and the woman from By Grand Central Station I Sat Down and Wept, the paper proves, the different circumstances surrounding their distress play a crucial role in determining their emotional outcomes. She feels that Doreen corrupts her and rejects her as a friend, AI decided I would watch her and listen to what she said, but deep down I would have nothing to do with her. We will write a custom essay sample on Women in Distress in Literature or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Deep down, I would be loyal to Betsy and her innocent friends. It was Betsy I resembled at heart.

Christians, Muslims, and Jews in the Age of Discovery by Ber essays

Christians, Muslims, and Jews in the Age of Discovery by Ber essays The relations of Christians, Jews, and Muslims around the Mediterranean were tumultuous for centuries, and still have consequences (in the Balkans, for instance) that we need to understand if we are to cope with politics and conflict today. In the book Cultures in Conflict. Christians, Muslims, and Jews in the Age of Discovery by Bernard Lewis, those relations are examined to reveal the relative position of each and the eventual decline of one to give rise to another. Lewis first examines the way Christians and Muslims looked at one another. Despite their mutual hostility, they understood each other's views rather well. Medieval Christians largely dismissed Muslim theology as post-Gospel heresy; but the Muslims themselves were regarded as serious social and military challengers. By contrast, a still primitive Christendom looked to sophisticated Muslims "rather as Central Asia or Africa appeared to Victorian Englishmen? (pp. 13). However, despite their knowledge of one another (or perhaps because of it), the Christian world was imbedded in a deep conflict with the Islamic and Jewish worlds. The Christian conflict with the Islamic world was, according to Lewis, the result of a rivalry based on three motives: faith, greed, and fear. From the first invasion of Muslim armies into Christian lands, Christendom lived under Islamic invasion not once but three times. It is obvious in this light why Christendom and Islam were in conflict because of the two-fold threat of conquest and of conversion. From the Islamic point of view, the conflict was entrenched the awareness that Christians were not merely barbarians, but a real threat due to the similarities in ideas and in equal drives of missionary expansionism. Lewis notes that the Muslims saw Christians as followers of a rival religion with a rival political system and a rival claim to what each thought of as the universal law of the land. The Christian world was in conflict ...

'Constitutional conventions are not law but nevertheless play an Essay

'Constitutional conventions are not law but nevertheless play an important role in the UK constitution.' Briefly define the - Essay Example An example is the convection that the United Kingdom prime minister cannot be in office unless he or she has the majority votes from the house of common.3 Enforceability in the court Constitutional convection can never be enforced by the court of law. This is because according to the supreme court of Canada 1981, the convection is mostly in conflict with formal laws postulated and courts bound to carry out the legal rules. This conflict between convection constitution and rule of law according to the court ruling, regardless of how well it is universally acceptable, can transform into law unless the parliament drafts a law or amend the constitution. By so doing the convection becomes a coded law; a principle referred to as authoritative.4 Since the conventions unenforceable by the law court, but rather by political processes they rarely are they included in law reports. The courts often recognize convection so as intelligently to discuss in broad the democratic system of government r esponsibility in its work. Such is in the case of the Attorney General v Jonathan Cape, whereby, the attorney general would have progressed if he had only based his argument in convection of collective ministerial responsibility. He based his argument on the doctrine of equity on breach of confidence.5 He used convectional fact to back his argument. Another example is the case Cartona v Commissioner of Works.6 The key reason as to why courts should not make use of the underlying constitution conventions to transform into law is because there exist no gap to cover, a case that seems hard appear so only when its focused on only constitutional law. According to Jennings, with the combination of conventions and constitutional law, it is vivid that the judges should appreciate the political means of enforcement instead of using underlying convectional principle as a way to convert constitutional conventions into judicial law.7 In the UK Politics, these connections are the ones that bring about true distribution of authority. A clear example is the role of sovereign power5 that seems to have same powers as the monarch on paper by exercising the royal prerogatives; the parliament can be dissolved by the sovereign. He also has authority to appoint and dismiss the government, ministers, prime minister and even deny her assent to any bill passed by the government. In the real sense, the sovereign does not yield any such power except on special circumstances. The operations of the UK government are in the hands of ministers elected and the officials acting under the law and royal prerogative residues. This entire establishment was through conventions.8 The conventions are binding non legal rules meaning that they are not part of law through pressure from the political class make it unrealistic, the members bound by these conventions do not break any rule by failing to bind by those law .9 Some conventions change over time, for example, prior to 1918, the UK cabinet had r equested a the parliament to be dissolved from the monarch, a request conveyed by the prime minister .Since then prime ministers request dissolutions